Wal-Mart looks wrong, feels so right
Corporate America may ruin small business, still appeals to cheap buyers
Thomas Moore
Issue date: 2/19/08 Section: Viewpoints
|
But when I need to go grocery shopping, I find myself filling a shopping cart with every article of food and gadgetry I can pull off the shelves.
At this point, I understand that there are plenty of readers who would love to point their fingers and label me as no more than a hypocrite. But how can I be blamed for shopping there? I don't have a lot of money. I can get everything I need at a price that I at least feel justified in paying. Wal-Marts are everywhere and many of them are open 24 hours. It's convenient, cheap and reliable.
The combination of all these facets of the store make it a very appealing place to shop. Also, it makes it much harder for me to hate Wal-Mart, even though I believe its hideous edifices and looming presence throughout nearly every county in our nation are leaving our land pock-marked and scarred. Imagine if Wal-Mart, or a store of equal magnitude, did not exist. What would all of the families living under the poverty line do to feed not only themselves, but their children as well?
The kind of economic pressure that capitalism places on people to provide for themselves leads people to doing scores of things, legal and otherwise for cash. Why do you think so many people become drug dealers? It's fast money that goes untaxed and is much more profitable than working an honest job. Do not think that I am implying that Wal-Mart's existence is curtailing the quantity of hustlers in our nation. I am simply stating that the affordability of Wal-Mart's products, ranging from car parts to food to clothing to movies, allow families to get by in a much more manageable fashion than if they all had to shop at the Food Lion.
Also, about two years ago I remember reading a headline that explained that 0.5 percent of all Americans work at Wal-Mart. The monster company has around 1.9 million employees. That's more than three times the population of Columbia. Though their employees are known for being treated terribly, they are still getting paid for labor. Wal-Mart even assists the elderly poor by offering them jobs as "greeters," even if those who hold these posts often depress customers more than cheer them up.
In the end, I still hate Wal-Mart. They are the paragon of evil corporate America. But I can't help believing that, from a microeconomic viewpoint at least, Wal-Mart offers Americans many advantages.
2008 Woodie Awards

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 14
good try
posted 2/19/08 @ 9:39 AM EST
You're cute, but your article is nonsensical. "I hate Wal*Mart, but I like it, but it's bad, but it's good." Maybe next time try finding something you have a solid opinion about, and THEN arguing for it. (Continued…)
bethbrooks11
Beth
posted 2/19/08 @ 12:13 PM EST
This was one of the worst articles ever. There is no clear direction, and the argument is completely torn between emotions felt about Wal-Mart. If you declare you hate it so much, why shop there. (Continued…)
Diane
posted 2/19/08 @ 1:10 PM EST
Thomas, I'm just curious . . . did you ever stop and think that because you admittedly "fill a shopping cart with every article of food and gadgetry I can pull off the shelves" that maybe you're not actually saving money by shopping at Wal-Mart? I am one of those Wal-Mart haters too, but I actually refrain from shopping there. (Continued…)
Megan
posted 2/19/08 @ 1:44 PM EST
I think a lot of you are misconstruing the point of the article. Nowadays, it's almost impossible to go ANYWHERE except Wal-Mart for your everyday needs. (Continued…)
Beth
posted 2/19/08 @ 1:47 PM EST
Do you think poor or working-class people want to do research about Wal-Mart? NO! If you are barely making ends meet, labor unions and Mom and Pops stores are the last things on your mind. (Continued…)
Megan
posted 2/19/08 @ 3:40 PM EST
Again, you need to learn to read. If you think my point was that poor or working class people need to do research, you are mistaken and again, misconstruing the argument being made. (Continued…)
Ryan
posted 2/19/08 @ 4:10 PM EST
Typical Wal-Mart haters. I always hate when people talk about mom and pop stores. Gees Wal-Mart didnt kill mom and pop stores on main street, MALLS killed main street. (Continued…)
MeganNovak
Megan
posted 2/19/08 @ 4:23 PM EST
Yea, second largest employer with the WORST BENEFITS. Wal-Mart's so-called "employee benefits" border the line of cruel and unusual punishment. In December 2005, a California court ordered Wal-Mart to pay $172 million in damages for failing to provide meal breaks to nearly 116,000 hourly workers as required under state law. (Continued…)
And..
posted 2/19/08 @ 4:59 PM EST
Not to mention, Wal-Mart has been known to encourage their employees to apply for government aid.
Peter
posted 2/19/08 @ 7:30 PM EST
Seeing as how its a low-end, high volume retailer, it's hard for Wal-Mart to really offer high amounts of benefits to its workers. I know, I know everyone hates large corporations and thinks they make insane amounts of money, but when looking at Wal-Mart, its important to note that when its profits are compared to how large the company is, they're not all that great. (Continued…)
Post a Comment