S.C. lags behind in gun control
Teenage violence could be curbed with common sense legislation
Rachel Wright
Issue date: 10/8/08 Section: Viewpoints
|
When I turned on the news yesterday morning, I learned of four gun-related deaths. In two of them, a teenager was killed. Two nights ago, a 16-year-old was found with a gunshot wound to the head in Richland County. In Orangeburg, a teen was accidently shot by his friend while hunting. The teen died and his friend, who is also under 18, was charged with involuntary manslaughter.
Nationally, two children are killed a day on average by another child using a handgun. Children can't legally possess firearms, yet they are killing each other.
Last April, the South Carolina legislature thought it would be a good idea to lower the legal age to carry a concealed weapon from 21 to 18. Awesome. So now 18-year-olds can go to war, smoke cigs, vote and carry a concealed weapon. I mean, if you can't bring alcohol to your 18th birthday, why not bring your concealed weapon? I understand that 18-year-olds are legally considered adults, but I can't think of too many reasons why an 18-year-old would need to carry a concealed weapon.
On top of this well-reasoned law change, South Carolina also does not have a Child Access Prevention Law, which requires gun owners to store their firearm in a place inaccessible to children or use a locking device to secure the gun. If a child would happen to obtain a gun, the owner would be held criminally liable. What a great idea.
While it should be common sense to keep a gun away from a child, many states need a law to ensure that children don't accidentally stumble upon their daddy's revolver and mistake it for an accessory to their G.I. Joe. This law should be a no-brainer for South Carolina legislators. However, they have obviously had a bit of a brain fart.
I am not against an American's right to "bear arms." However, many states, especially South Carolina, need to increase laws restricting gun possession and use. Owning a gun does require a permit, but gun owners should be required to own child safety locks in all cases. They should also be required to attend several safety and gun education courses for as long as they own their gun. This would deter some from wanting to own a gun, and would thus weed out some of the more careless people seeking a gun permit.
By passing simple laws such as these, the safety of teenagers and children would greatly increase. While a 3-year-old accidentally shoots his little sister and a 16-year-old is murdered by his 14-year-old friend, the S.C. legislature sits dormant on the issue of gun laws. Until stricter laws are passed, we can expect gun-related violence among children and teens to increase. Intentional or unintentional, the bottom line is that gun-related deaths should not be so rampant among America's youth.
2008 Woodie Awards

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 30
Scott
posted 10/08/08 @ 8:06 AM EST
You say "teenage violence could be curbed with common sense legislation" but then a few sentences later you say "children can't legally possess firearms, yet they are killing each other. (Continued…)
Sterling
posted 10/08/08 @ 9:19 AM EST
Well, if you take out the stats that involve the worthless, POS gang-bangers and the stupid, back-woods, trailer trash who leave a .357 on the nightstand 24/7, then I'd say our numbers would be pretty damned good. (Continued…)
Dan Zabriskie
posted 10/08/08 @ 9:39 AM EST
The above article is factually false. First "children" are defined by the Justice Department and the CDC as under age 15.
Second, from the CDC, nationwide figure for children:
Leading Causes of Unintentional Injury Deaths, Unintentional Firearm - 72. (Continued…)
David Robertson
posted 10/08/08 @ 9:43 AM EST
South Carolina does not "lag behind." South Carolina is a free state, unlike New Jersey, New York, Mass., Maryland, Illinois, and California. We have a government that respects our freedom, where the abovementioned states do not. (Continued…)
David Robertson
David Robertson
posted 10/08/08 @ 9:58 AM EST
It's good to see that my previous posting was deleted. Nothing like censorship to lend a hand when someone points out all the holes in your argument, huh?
David Robertson
David Robertson
posted 10/08/08 @ 10:00 AM EST
How odd. I guess I'll retract my last post, as somehow my original post has re-appeared.
Bubbletoes - Aiken
posted 10/08/08 @ 10:20 AM EST
This 'third-year student' seems well-meaning, but needs to study ALL the facts first before writing an article on a matter with so many facets. The piece is biased and full of false beliefs, and is clearly written with a personal agenda/point of view instead of a well-researched, balanced rendition. (Continued…)
Chris
posted 10/08/08 @ 10:36 AM EST
Apparently they are not teaching critical thinking in college anymore. What a shame.
Scott
posted 10/08/08 @ 10:40 AM EST
Also to the writer of the article, some of these replies may seem a little harsh, and future comments may be even more so, but you've got to understand that people do get offensive when someone not educated on a topic suggests rules and laws that affect something that the readers ARE educated on and feel strongly about (especially something that our Constitution recognizes as a God-given right). (Continued…)
cphilip
posted 10/08/08 @ 11:01 AM EST
SC did not lower the age for Concealed Weapons permits. And no such amendment has ever been put forth. Your research is clearly lacking and not just in that area. (Continued…)
Post a Comment