The Daily Gamecock

Letter to the Editor: Demanding more parking is not the answer

As someone who has lived off campus for multiple years, I understand how tough parking can be for those of us who commute. But let's not forget: we are incredibly lucky here at USC. Some universities charge double what we charge, and some simply don't have enough to even offer to all students. The desire to park right outside of your class every single day is unrealistic and ridiculous. The truth is, just like in any urban setting, if you want prime parking, you pay. Upperclassman have the opportunity to purchase parking stickers before freshman. Lack of parking isn't the issue — attitude is.

Like many other students, I'm taking out thousands of dollars of loans in order to be here, and $300 or more each semester is a lot to ask for. For the past few years, I've purchased a commuter pass. I only pay $90 for the year, which is extremely reasonable and downright cheap. I have to wake up and get to campus extremely early to guarantee a spot at the Bates lot, and I spend a few hours in the library before I actually have class. Yes, sometimes it's frustrating, but it's also fair. I understand that I get what I pay for. I've arranged my classes and my job to work around this.

I sympathize with those who have missed class because of a lack of parking. I do believe those "prime" parking spots should be reserved for those with disabilities, injuries or medical conditions that really need it, not students who desire to get to class and park right outside five minutes before it starts. This is a good lesson for when we go out into the real world; we are not entitled to everything convenient and there won't be prime parking everywhere we go. You might have to walk a little, and you might have to get there early.

I understand that many students have jobs, internships or other activities that prevent them from being able to get to campus early. As adults we have to adjust and compromise. If you want prime parking, you're going to have to pay for it. Demanding there be more parking is not the answer.


Comments