Opinion: Boycotting brands can only do so much damage
By Alexis King | July 2, 2019Boycotting brands because they go against our views can make a momentary uproar, but it doesn't have an impact in the long run.
Boycotting brands because they go against our views can make a momentary uproar, but it doesn't have an impact in the long run.
Social media is good for international communication, but talking in person can never be replaced.
Coming out can lead to LGBTQ+ people losing their homes, their jobs and their safety.
Making your life seem perfect can hurt yourself and your followers in the long term, and social media has the opportunity to be more than that.
Being an ally should never revolve around only the people you know.
Coming from a small, predominantly black town and high school, attending USC caused immense culture shock.
Editor-in-chief Tori Richman says farewell.
The university always has room to grow in its relationship with mental health.
Starbucks helps stressed college students around campus.
Adderall shouldn't be treated like it's on the same level as coffee — it has far more negative effects and should not be abused by students.
Even with the renovations to the student union, upperclassmen are still not likely to be found in Russell house.
Meat production accounts for an abundance of animal cruelty.
Reading for pleasure should be encouraged.
With end of the year stress, walking does wonders to ease the pain of finals.
While both smartphone apps embrace the short length video format, they differ in the type of content that is made.
Even though social media can be a scary place, it has many advantages that bring the world together.
Even with the work to end the objectification of women, the media continually objectifies men and removes their individuality.